A public directory of MCP and A2A agents that have been measured against five deterministic conditions. Every verdict carries a SHA-256 anyone can recompute. Passing entries are green; anything still in process stays visibly separate. Where a condition does not apply, it is stated, not skipped.
検証の扉が実測した対象を並べる公開レジストリ。適合は緑、手続き中は分けて表示し、対象外は明記する。判定はSHA-256で誰でも再計算でき、扉は自分自身にも同じ基準を当てる。
No human discretion. The gate calls the endpoint itself and decides deterministically. Self-declaration is never the evidence. That is why it can be free and open.
Green is not painted ahead of measurement. An entry the gate could not reach, or one still in hearing, says so.
This runs in your browser, against the live gate. The verdict's SHA-256 is recomputed here, on your side, and compared. Nothing is taken on trust.
Every verdict carries a tools_called field, and by default it reads none. Measuring determinism would mean executing a tool on the checked server, and the first tool a server lists may well be destructive. So the gate reports that condition as not measured rather than guessing, and says why. If you own the server and want it measured, send allow_tool_call: true and the verdict will record that a tool was called by consent. You can point this at somebody else's endpoint without touching their data.他人のサーバーには許可なくツールを呼ばない。測っていないものを測ったことにしない。
Endpoints on the same Cloudflare account as the gate (hs-mcp, No.002) come back with every condition failed, because a Worker to Worker call over workers.dev never reaches the target. Measured on 2026-08-08: the gate sees 404 on paths that answer 200 from any machine outside the account. The gate puts that in the verdict instead of hiding it, and the verdict's hash still recomputes, so a failed check is still a verifiable statement. Run it from your own machine and those hosts respond normally.
No API key. Read-only. Point it at our servers, or at any server we never touched.
If A does not match, the verdict was altered. If B fails, the applicant sees exactly why it failed (so it can be run before applying). If C does not match, the declaration was altered. In every case the correct response is to reject, the same posture the gate takes toward itself.
Conformance and disclosure, measured. No price validation.
Figures traced to a third-party obtainable primary source.
Dedicated MCP server, operations, and a full audit log.
Listing is free and always will be. Nobody pays to appear here, nobody pays for position, and the verdict itself is never sold. You do not need to pass before you start.
One command. No key, no signup. The verdict names the condition that failed and why, so you can fix it before anyone else looks. No tool on your server is called unless you add allow_tool_call: true.
Public, on GitHub, with a template. Submissions are visible to everyone, including the ones that failed. There is no private queue and no fast lane.
You may open one even if you failed. Ask why, and the answer is free.落ちていても開いてよい
We do not take your word for the result, and you should not take ours. We run the check ourselves, read-only, and post the verdict with its record_sha256 in the same issue so you can recompute it. If it passes, the row goes up. If it does not, the reply says what to change, and that costs nothing either.
Condition 03 requires every applicant to publish who funds it. It would be incoherent for the operator of that condition to say less about itself than it asks of others. This is the operator's declaration, in the same shape the gate reads from an agent card.
Read the fourth line first. The operator earns nothing extra when an entry passes. There is no success fee, so there is no financial reason to be generous with a verdict. The three lines above it say the same thing from other directions: nobody pays to be listed, nobody pays for position, and no cut is taken from work that results from being found here.成功報酬0。誰かを通しても運営の収入は増えない。判定を甘くする動機が構造的に無い。
Two things, both above the free line, both stated in the machine-readable spec at /spec as tiers.
The free tier checks that a server discloses and behaves consistently. This one checks the numbers: that each figure traces to a primary source a third party can obtain independently. Conformance says the machine is honest about itself; this says the data survives an outside look.
A dedicated MCP server built and operated for one organisation, with a full audit log. This is construction and operations work, priced as a build and a monthly service, never as a fee for a verdict.
The paid layers exist today for Japanese construction only, because that is where the underlying dataset, the thirty years of site experience, and the licensing sit. If you arrived here as an MCP developer outside that field, the honest answer is that there is currently nothing here to sell you, and the conformance check is genuinely all you will be charged for, which is nothing. This page would rather say that than manufacture an offer.有料層は現在、日本の建設のみ。それ以外の読者に今売れるものは無い。無い、と書く。
Anyone who both issues a verdict and sells help obtaining it has a conflict. Naming it is not enough, so here is what actually bounds it.
A registry is only worth reading if its own rules are fixed in advance and stated in public. These are ours.
Corrections are welcome and are treated as defects. If an entry here is wrong, or a condition is measured differently on your side, say so and it is re-measured in public. The contact below is real.